adidas Adizero Evo SLvsASICS Noosa Tri 16
The adidas Adizero Evo SL and ASICS Noosa Tri 16 score 38% on spec similarity. Going from the adidas Adizero Evo SL to the ASICS Noosa Tri 16: 9 g lighter.
Side by side
The Δ column is the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 minus the adidas Adizero Evo SL. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | adidas Adizero Evo SL | ASICS Noosa Tri 16 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | — | 33.5 mm | — |
| Forefoot stack | — | 28.5 mm | — |
| Drop | — | 5 mm | — |
| Weight | 224 g | 215 g | −9g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | — | — |
| Category | Tempo | Tempo | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Road | Road | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
The numbers on record give no spec reason to choose it over the other.
adidas Adizero Evo SL vs ASICS Noosa Tri 16: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the adidas Adizero Evo SL or the ASICS Noosa Tri 16?
The ASICS Noosa Tri 16, at 215 g vs 224 g, 9 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published, at each brand's reference size: men's UK 8.5 for the adidas Adizero Evo SL, men's (size not stated) for the ASICS Noosa Tri 16.
How similar are the adidas Adizero Evo SL and the ASICS Noosa Tri 16?
They score 38% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our tempo category.