trova.run
VS Versus

adidas Terrex Agravic SLvsSaucony Guide TR

The adidas Terrex Agravic SL and Saucony Guide TR score 62% on spec similarity. Going from the adidas Terrex Agravic SL to the Saucony Guide TR: 2 mm more heel stack and 29 g heavier, with the same drop.

Side by side

The Δ column is the Saucony Guide TR minus the adidas Terrex Agravic SL. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.

adidas Terrex Agravic SL vs Saucony Guide TR specifications
Specadidas Terrex Agravic SLSaucony Guide TRΔ
Heel stack39 mm41 mm+2mm
Forefoot stack33 mm35 mm+2mm
Drop6 mm6 mm±0mm
Weight279 g308 g+29g
RRP (GBP)—£140—
CategoryTrailTrailsame
SupportNeutralStabilitydiffers
SurfaceTrailTrailsame
StatusCurrentCurrentsame

Who should pick which

Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.

Pick the
adidas Terrex Agravic SL

if you want:

  • a lower heel stack (39 vs 41 mm)
  • a lighter shoe (279 vs 308 g)
Pick the
Saucony Guide TR

if you want:

  • more heel stack (41 vs 39 mm)
FAQ FAQ

adidas Terrex Agravic SL vs Saucony Guide TR: questions

Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.

Which is lighter, the adidas Terrex Agravic SL or the Saucony Guide TR?

The adidas Terrex Agravic SL, at 279 g vs 308 g, 29 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).

Which has more cushioning stack, the adidas Terrex Agravic SL or the Saucony Guide TR?

The Saucony Guide TR, with 41 mm of heel stack vs 39 mm, 2 mm more. Forefoot stack: 33 mm for the adidas Terrex Agravic SL and 35 mm for the Saucony Guide TR.

What's the drop difference between the adidas Terrex Agravic SL and the Saucony Guide TR?

None: both have a 6 mm heel-to-toe drop.

How similar are the adidas Terrex Agravic SL and the Saucony Guide TR?

They score 62% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.