ASICS GT-2000 15vsPuma ForeverRun Nitro 3
The ASICS GT-2000 15 and Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3 score 89% on spec similarity. Going from the ASICS GT-2000 15 to the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3: 38 g heavier, with the same heel stack and drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3 minus the ASICS GT-2000 15. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | ASICS GT-2000 15 | Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 38 mm | ±0mm |
| Forefoot stack | 30 mm | 30 mm | ±0mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 252 g | 290 g | +38g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £140 | — |
| Category | Daily trainer | Daily trainer | same |
| Support | Stability | Stability | same |
| Surface | Road | Road | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
The numbers on record give no spec reason to choose it over the other.
ASICS GT-2000 15 vs Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the ASICS GT-2000 15 or the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3?
The ASICS GT-2000 15, at 252 g vs 290 g, 38 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published, at each brand's reference size: men's size 9 (region not stated) for the ASICS GT-2000 15, reference size not recorded for the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3.
Which has more cushioning stack, the ASICS GT-2000 15 or the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3?
They publish the same heel stack: 38 mm. Forefoot stack: 30 mm for the ASICS GT-2000 15 and 30 mm for the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3.
What's the drop difference between the ASICS GT-2000 15 and the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3?
None: both have an 8 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the ASICS GT-2000 15 and the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 3?
They score 89% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our daily trainer category.