ASICS Noosa Tri 16vsHOKA Mach 7
The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and HOKA Mach 7 score 84% on spec similarity. Going from the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 to the HOKA Mach 7: 3.5 mm more heel stack and 22 g heavier, with the same drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the HOKA Mach 7 minus the ASICS Noosa Tri 16. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | ASICS Noosa Tri 16 | HOKA Mach 7 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 33.5 mm | 37 mm | +3.5mm |
| Forefoot stack | 28.5 mm | 32 mm | +3.5mm |
| Drop | 5 mm | 5 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 237 g | +22g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £140 | — |
| Category | Tempo | Tempo | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Road | Road | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a lower heel stack (33.5 vs 37 mm)
- a lighter shoe (215 vs 237 g)
ASICS Noosa Tri 16 vs HOKA Mach 7: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 or the HOKA Mach 7?
The ASICS Noosa Tri 16, at 215 g vs 237 g, 22 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 or the HOKA Mach 7?
The HOKA Mach 7, with 37 mm of heel stack vs 33.5 mm, 3.5 mm more. Forefoot stack: 28.5 mm for the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and 32 mm for the HOKA Mach 7.
What's the drop difference between the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and the HOKA Mach 7?
None: both have a 5 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and the HOKA Mach 7?
They score 84% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our tempo category.