ASICS Noosa Tri 16vsNew Balance FuelCell Rebel v5
The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 score 77% on spec similarity. Going from the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 to the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5: 1.5 mm more heel stack and 1 mm more drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 minus the ASICS Noosa Tri 16. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | ASICS Noosa Tri 16 | New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 33.5 mm | 35 mm | +1.5mm |
| Forefoot stack | 28.5 mm | 29 mm | +0.5mm |
| Drop | 5 mm | 6 mm | +1mm |
| Weight | 215 g | — | — |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £140 | — |
| Category | Tempo | Tempo | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Road | Road | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a lower heel stack (33.5 vs 35 mm)
- a lower heel-to-toe drop (5 vs 6 mm)
if you want:
- more heel stack (35 vs 33.5 mm)
- a higher heel-to-toe drop (6 vs 5 mm)
ASICS Noosa Tri 16 vs New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which has more cushioning stack, the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 or the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5?
The New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5, with 35 mm of heel stack vs 33.5 mm, 1.5 mm more. Forefoot stack: 28.5 mm for the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and 29 mm for the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5.
What's the drop difference between the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5?
1 mm. The ASICS Noosa Tri 16 has a 5 mm drop and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5 a 6 mm drop.
How similar are the ASICS Noosa Tri 16 and the New Balance FuelCell Rebel v5?
They score 77% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our tempo category.