Brooks Cascadia 20vsNike Wildhorse 10
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Nike Wildhorse 10 score 87% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Nike Wildhorse 10: 3.5 mm more drop and 5 g heavier, with the same heel stack.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Nike Wildhorse 10 minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Nike Wildhorse 10 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 38 mm | ±0mm |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | 28.5 mm | −3.5mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 9.5 mm | +3.5mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 311 g | +5g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £134.99 | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a lower heel-to-toe drop (6 vs 9.5 mm)
- a lighter shoe (306 vs 311 g)
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Nike Wildhorse 10: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Nike Wildhorse 10?
The Brooks Cascadia 20, at 306 g vs 311 g, 5 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published, at each brand's reference size: men's (size not stated) for the Brooks Cascadia 20, men's UK 9 for the Nike Wildhorse 10.
Which has more cushioning stack, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Nike Wildhorse 10?
They publish the same heel stack: 38 mm. Forefoot stack: 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20 and 28.5 mm for the Nike Wildhorse 10.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Nike Wildhorse 10?
3.5 mm. The Brooks Cascadia 20 has a 6 mm drop and the Nike Wildhorse 10 a 9.5 mm drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Nike Wildhorse 10?
They score 87% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.