Brooks Cascadia 20vsNike Zegama ACG
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Nike Zegama ACG score 47% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Nike Zegama ACG: 2 mm less drop and 32 g heavier.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Nike Zegama ACG minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Nike Zegama ACG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | — | — |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | — | — |
| Drop | 6 mm | 4 mm | −2mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 338 g | +32g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £154.99 | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a higher heel-to-toe drop (6 vs 4 mm)
- a lighter shoe (306 vs 338 g)
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Nike Zegama ACG: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Nike Zegama ACG?
The Brooks Cascadia 20, at 306 g vs 338 g, 32 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published, at each brand's reference size: men's (size not stated) for the Brooks Cascadia 20, men's UK 9 for the Nike Zegama ACG.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Nike Zegama ACG?
2 mm. The Brooks Cascadia 20 has a 6 mm drop and the Nike Zegama ACG a 4 mm drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Nike Zegama ACG?
They score 47% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.