Brooks Cascadia 20vsSalomon Glide Max TR
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Salomon Glide Max TR score 96% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Salomon Glide Max TR: 20 g lighter, with the same heel stack and drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Salomon Glide Max TR minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Salomon Glide Max TR | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 38 mm | ±0mm |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | 32 mm | ±0mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 6 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 286 g | −20g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | — | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
The numbers on record give no spec reason to choose it over the other.
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Salomon Glide Max TR: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Salomon Glide Max TR?
The Salomon Glide Max TR, at 286 g vs 306 g, 20 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Salomon Glide Max TR?
They publish the same heel stack: 38 mm. Forefoot stack: 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20 and 32 mm for the Salomon Glide Max TR.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Salomon Glide Max TR?
None: both have a 6 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Salomon Glide Max TR?
They score 96% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.