Brooks Cascadia 20vsSaucony Guide TR
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Saucony Guide TR score 64% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Saucony Guide TR: 3 mm more heel stack and 2 g heavier, with the same drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Saucony Guide TR minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Saucony Guide TR | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 41 mm | +3mm |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | 35 mm | +3mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 6 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 308 g | +2g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £140 | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Stability | differs |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a lower heel stack (38 vs 41 mm)
- a lighter shoe (306 vs 308 g)
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Saucony Guide TR: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Saucony Guide TR?
The Brooks Cascadia 20, at 306 g vs 308 g, 2 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Saucony Guide TR?
The Saucony Guide TR, with 41 mm of heel stack vs 38 mm, 3 mm more. Forefoot stack: 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20 and 35 mm for the Saucony Guide TR.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Saucony Guide TR?
None: both have a 6 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Saucony Guide TR?
They score 64% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.