Brooks Cascadia 20vsSaucony Xodus Ultra 4
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 score 96% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4: 2 mm less heel stack and 3 g heavier, with the same drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 36 mm | −2mm |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | 30 mm | −2mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 6 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 309 g | +3g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £150 | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- more heel stack (38 vs 36 mm)
- a lighter shoe (306 vs 309 g)
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4?
The Brooks Cascadia 20, at 306 g vs 309 g, 3 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4?
The Brooks Cascadia 20, with 38 mm of heel stack vs 36 mm, 2 mm more. Forefoot stack: 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20 and 30 mm for the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4?
None: both have a 6 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4?
They score 96% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.