Brooks Cascadia 20vsTopo Athletic Vista
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Topo Athletic Vista score 99% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Topo Athletic Vista: 1 mm less drop and 3 g heavier, with the same heel stack.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Topo Athletic Vista minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Topo Athletic Vista | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 38 mm | ±0mm |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | 33 mm | +1mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 5 mm | −1mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 309 g | +3g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | — | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a higher heel-to-toe drop (6 vs 5 mm)
- a lighter shoe (306 vs 309 g)
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Topo Athletic Vista: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Topo Athletic Vista?
The Brooks Cascadia 20, at 306 g vs 309 g, 3 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Topo Athletic Vista?
They publish the same heel stack: 38 mm. Forefoot stack: 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20 and 33 mm for the Topo Athletic Vista.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Topo Athletic Vista?
1 mm. The Brooks Cascadia 20 has a 6 mm drop and the Topo Athletic Vista a 5 mm drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Topo Athletic Vista?
They score 99% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.