trova.run
VS Versus

Salomon ThundercrossvsSaucony Peregrine 16

The Salomon Thundercross and Saucony Peregrine 16 score 77% on spec similarity. Going from the Salomon Thundercross to the Saucony Peregrine 16: 1 mm more heel stack, with the same drop.

Side by side

The Δ column is the Saucony Peregrine 16 minus the Salomon Thundercross. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.

Salomon Thundercross vs Saucony Peregrine 16 specifications
SpecSalomon ThundercrossSaucony Peregrine 16Δ
Heel stack31 mm32 mm+1mm
Forefoot stack—28 mm—
Drop4 mm4 mm±0mm
Weight———
RRP (GBP)—£140—
CategoryTrailTrailsame
SupportNeutralNeutralsame
SurfaceTrailTrailsame
StatusCurrentCurrentsame

Who should pick which

Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.

Pick the
Salomon Thundercross

if you want:

  • a lower heel stack (31 vs 32 mm)
Pick the
Saucony Peregrine 16

if you want:

  • more heel stack (32 vs 31 mm)
FAQ FAQ

Salomon Thundercross vs Saucony Peregrine 16: questions

Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.

Which has more cushioning stack, the Salomon Thundercross or the Saucony Peregrine 16?

The Saucony Peregrine 16, with 32 mm of heel stack vs 31 mm, 1 mm more.

What's the drop difference between the Salomon Thundercross and the Saucony Peregrine 16?

None: both have a 4 mm heel-to-toe drop.

How similar are the Salomon Thundercross and the Saucony Peregrine 16?

They score 77% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.